This past Saturday, we took a look at pull-ups, from the simple jump to the butterfly, and followed that up with a run at Cindy, doing as many rounds as possible of 5 pull-ups, 10 push-ups, and 15 squats in a 20 minute period. We had a great push from everyone that came, especially the new guys.
Sunday, Ben and I went to Richmond to attend an Olympic Weightlifting seminar, headed up by Chris Wilkes and assisted by his sons. The seminar was absolutely great; everyone got tons of reps on all the major lifts (snatch, clean, and jerk), all of them critiqued by a top coach and his three sons, all national medalists. Hopefully we'll get a chance to show you guys some of the material we learned in the coming weeks...
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Deadlift mechanics
This past Saturday, we met and looked at some cues and fixes for squat and deadlift mechanics, and then broke in the new Pendlay bar and Olympic lifting plates at Rocky Top on deadlifts, working our way up from 40kg all the way up to 160kg! Cooling down included some tomfoolery on the rings and parallel bars. Great efforts from everyone!
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Moving Along
Great job to everyone last Sunday! We hope everyone enjoyed the workout as much as we had fun encouraging you guys and watching you guys put it all out! The workout for this week will be indoors, in anticipation of some possibly bad weather.
Class will be held at 11:30am this Saturday at Rocky Top Rec (here). There will be an instructional portion first, looking at barbell mechanics and exercises, followed by a workout.
Something we've also been discussing is sport-focused training. Though Crossfit centers on general fitness, it is also endlessly adaptable to improving specific modes of activity. If there's a sport you play that you want to be in better shape for, be sure to mention it Saturday. Also, on your own time, consider if there are particular things you'd like to improve. If it's a sport that involves on-the-ground movement, are you concerned with agility? Maybe long-term endurance or ability to generate many small bursts? Think about your athletic demands and where you'd like to see your own gains.
Class will be held at 11:30am this Saturday at Rocky Top Rec (here). There will be an instructional portion first, looking at barbell mechanics and exercises, followed by a workout.
Something we've also been discussing is sport-focused training. Though Crossfit centers on general fitness, it is also endlessly adaptable to improving specific modes of activity. If there's a sport you play that you want to be in better shape for, be sure to mention it Saturday. Also, on your own time, consider if there are particular things you'd like to improve. If it's a sport that involves on-the-ground movement, are you concerned with agility? Maybe long-term endurance or ability to generate many small bursts? Think about your athletic demands and where you'd like to see your own gains.
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Starting Up
We'll be kicking things off for a new school year, this time starting off with an introductory group workout at the UVA track (http://www.virginia.edu/webmap/FUHallAndAthletic.html - Lannigan Field). The meeting time is 4:30pm on Sunday, September 7. Wear comfortable clothes and tennis shoes. No previous experience is required, and anybody at any level of fitness can participate; everyone will get involved in the group workout!
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Gearing Up
The school year is fast approaching, and things will be getting started soon. Things will be a bit different this year: Jon's gotten a level one certification, and we may have some new things going on in terms of the facilities and equipment available to us. Hopefully we'll be able to make good use of it all and everyone will be able to get some benefits and make some advancements. I thought I'd start things off with a thoughtful piece on training written by Rob Shaul, owner/trainer of Mountain Athlete, in Jackson Wyoming:
"When the roads are dry enough, I favor a running-based, power endurance effort over a rower, or gym based effort. One of the many conflicting things I find in the literature from the "experts" is the transferability of cardio-modes to one another.
By "cardio-mode" I mean running, rowing, swimming, biking - or non-gym based ways to make athletes breath.
Part of the goal is to train energy systems. Expert Endurance coaches describe training our aerobic energy system buy doing long, slow, distance training. We burn fat for energy on these efforts, and the more we do, the more efficient we become. This is bad for losing weight, but great for performance on endurance efforts.
Heart rate training experts like Joe Friel, however, note that the aerobic "zone" and other heart rate zones differ between modes. In other words, working hard while running occurs at a lower heart rate than at biking and swimming.
Glassman says aerobic conditioning is definitely "mode specific" - which is why great endurance athletes will "blow up" aerobically when subjected to their first intense CrossFit-inspired circuit which includes a barbell or dumbbell exercise.
So, we need to train mode specifically - according to our sport - in addition to general conditioning.
I've had big guys who could crush the rower, but get crushed by a run. Thing is, rarely do you row anywhere in the mountains. So the rower is a great general conditioning tool, but its transferability to running and hiking uphill is not perfect. And I've had guides who can run and hike uphill fast and forever, likewise "flail" when subjected at first to the rower.
One of the dangers of our programing is we can lose site of the goal. We train in the gym to complement and improve our training and performance in the field, or for our sport. The gym training can become its own "sport" - which can lead to neglect of our sport specific training and practice.
The CrossFit advocates argue that their approach is the best preparation for many sports and they point to how well CrossFitters do in competitions as proof.
They could be right, but this has not been my experience. Hybrid training may take you far down the competition road, but to truly be elite, I believe most athletes need to more and more sport specific in their training the closer they get to the competing season."
He runs a great, thoughtful site, and the url for this quote is here: http://www.mtnathlete.com/id198.html.
Anyways, once we get an idea for when everyone gets back, we can start things up again.
"When the roads are dry enough, I favor a running-based, power endurance effort over a rower, or gym based effort. One of the many conflicting things I find in the literature from the "experts" is the transferability of cardio-modes to one another.
By "cardio-mode" I mean running, rowing, swimming, biking - or non-gym based ways to make athletes breath.
Part of the goal is to train energy systems. Expert Endurance coaches describe training our aerobic energy system buy doing long, slow, distance training. We burn fat for energy on these efforts, and the more we do, the more efficient we become. This is bad for losing weight, but great for performance on endurance efforts.
Heart rate training experts like Joe Friel, however, note that the aerobic "zone" and other heart rate zones differ between modes. In other words, working hard while running occurs at a lower heart rate than at biking and swimming.
Glassman says aerobic conditioning is definitely "mode specific" - which is why great endurance athletes will "blow up" aerobically when subjected to their first intense CrossFit-inspired circuit which includes a barbell or dumbbell exercise.
So, we need to train mode specifically - according to our sport - in addition to general conditioning.
I've had big guys who could crush the rower, but get crushed by a run. Thing is, rarely do you row anywhere in the mountains. So the rower is a great general conditioning tool, but its transferability to running and hiking uphill is not perfect. And I've had guides who can run and hike uphill fast and forever, likewise "flail" when subjected at first to the rower.
One of the dangers of our programing is we can lose site of the goal. We train in the gym to complement and improve our training and performance in the field, or for our sport. The gym training can become its own "sport" - which can lead to neglect of our sport specific training and practice.
The CrossFit advocates argue that their approach is the best preparation for many sports and they point to how well CrossFitters do in competitions as proof.
They could be right, but this has not been my experience. Hybrid training may take you far down the competition road, but to truly be elite, I believe most athletes need to more and more sport specific in their training the closer they get to the competing season."
He runs a great, thoughtful site, and the url for this quote is here: http://www.mtnathlete.com/id198.html.
Anyways, once we get an idea for when everyone gets back, we can start things up again.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Headquarters
As some of you may or may not know, Jonathan recently got a level 1 certification at Crossfit Camp Pendleton. The following is his first write up of the experience:
I recently attended the Level 1 Cert at Camp Pendleton. Here’s a brief review of the cert for those of you who have been toying with the notion of dropping $1,000 on two days of training. I will follow this short post up with a longer meditation on CF programming theory as it compares with the approach that Mark Twight is using at GymJones. Stay tuned.
Was it worth a thousand bucks? Yes – and here’s why:
Prior to the cert, CrossFit sends you a ton of pdf. files to read; they literally send you a link to every CF journal issue ever published online. If you do all of the assigned readings (if you’re like me, you’ll do far more reading than is assigned), you go into the cert with a fantastic background in CF theory, movement-mechanics, and philosophy.
The classroom sessions during the cert thoroughly reinforce, and expand upon, the online study materials. A two hour long Q&A with Coach Glassman gives you plenty of time to ask skeptical questions (e.g. “What about cardio?”; “Why don’t workouts incorporate the Turkish getup?”) and to probe the boundaries of CrossFit’s empirical fitness paradigm.
Coach Glassman is the egghead’s meathead. He speaks authoritatively, with the diction of one who is versed, not only in sports-medicine and kinesiology, but also in basic philosophy of science. He defends only those parts of his program that have been empirically verified as successful (you may or may not have realized that the CF message boards are part of an open-source, exercise-data bonanza that Coach has been using to test theories about the relationship between training stimulus and adaptive response). When presented with new ideas about programming, his reaction was almost always: “Try it, and let me know how it goes.” If it increases performance without negative externalities – do it. That is precisely how the current CF program has evolved – scientific, verificationist trial and error.
The physical training sessions provide an opportunity to practice every fundamental WOD movement under the expert supervision of some of the best CF athletes/trainers (for me, this included Adrian Bozman and Jenevive Jolie). These sessions allow you to perfect your own movement, and to try your hand at spotting and correcting errors in other people’s movements. You may think (as I once did) that your deadlift technique leaves nothing to be desired, but the experienced trainers can spot subtle mechanical errors that your gym-buddies simply don’t notice. You will receive valuable corrections and you will improve.
Finally, performing the daily workout with 50+ people grunting and cheering you on (and Rage Against the Machine playing in the background) is a memorable adrenaline rush.
With maximum respect,
-Forney
P.S. I tried this very simple, deadly workout the other day: 120 Burpee-Pull-Ups, for time. (The jump from the burpee should carry you into a kipping pull-up in one continuous motion). At 16:22, this was a grinding workout that I would highly recommend.
Stay tuned for more...
I recently attended the Level 1 Cert at Camp Pendleton. Here’s a brief review of the cert for those of you who have been toying with the notion of dropping $1,000 on two days of training. I will follow this short post up with a longer meditation on CF programming theory as it compares with the approach that Mark Twight is using at GymJones. Stay tuned.
Was it worth a thousand bucks? Yes – and here’s why:
Prior to the cert, CrossFit sends you a ton of pdf. files to read; they literally send you a link to every CF journal issue ever published online. If you do all of the assigned readings (if you’re like me, you’ll do far more reading than is assigned), you go into the cert with a fantastic background in CF theory, movement-mechanics, and philosophy.
The classroom sessions during the cert thoroughly reinforce, and expand upon, the online study materials. A two hour long Q&A with Coach Glassman gives you plenty of time to ask skeptical questions (e.g. “What about cardio?”; “Why don’t workouts incorporate the Turkish getup?”) and to probe the boundaries of CrossFit’s empirical fitness paradigm.
Coach Glassman is the egghead’s meathead. He speaks authoritatively, with the diction of one who is versed, not only in sports-medicine and kinesiology, but also in basic philosophy of science. He defends only those parts of his program that have been empirically verified as successful (you may or may not have realized that the CF message boards are part of an open-source, exercise-data bonanza that Coach has been using to test theories about the relationship between training stimulus and adaptive response). When presented with new ideas about programming, his reaction was almost always: “Try it, and let me know how it goes.” If it increases performance without negative externalities – do it. That is precisely how the current CF program has evolved – scientific, verificationist trial and error.
The physical training sessions provide an opportunity to practice every fundamental WOD movement under the expert supervision of some of the best CF athletes/trainers (for me, this included Adrian Bozman and Jenevive Jolie). These sessions allow you to perfect your own movement, and to try your hand at spotting and correcting errors in other people’s movements. You may think (as I once did) that your deadlift technique leaves nothing to be desired, but the experienced trainers can spot subtle mechanical errors that your gym-buddies simply don’t notice. You will receive valuable corrections and you will improve.
Finally, performing the daily workout with 50+ people grunting and cheering you on (and Rage Against the Machine playing in the background) is a memorable adrenaline rush.
With maximum respect,
-Forney
P.S. I tried this very simple, deadly workout the other day: 120 Burpee-Pull-Ups, for time. (The jump from the burpee should carry you into a kipping pull-up in one continuous motion). At 16:22, this was a grinding workout that I would highly recommend.
Stay tuned for more...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

